Runtime failure → portable recovery
When replay timelines diverge, packaging stays verifier-shaped
Illustrative ops sketch: two bounded replay slices stop aligning with the same declared coordination handles — teams repackage continuity without claiming live remediation, wire authority, or autonomous execution.
Synthetic illustrative scenario only — no real customer data, no protected payloads, no regulator role claimed, no autonomous execution authority for external systems, and no claim that graphics depict production screenshots.
Non-enforcing, replay-safe framing: surfaces derive JSON from guided-demo scope only; carriesExecutionAuthority is false throughout verifier artifacts.
{ "carriesExecutionAuthority": false }Illustrative ribbon — not a production screenshot or KPI chart.
Before
- Release notes pointed at static log exports — continuity across workflow revisions was descriptive, not replay-hashable.
- Verifier reviewers lacked a portable way to compare topology echoes across revisions without manual stitching.
Runtime event
- Replay Studio (seeded guided demo) highlights an illustrative discontinuity between replay intervals — not a real outage or incident report.
- TrustGraph runtime overlays summarize coordination handles from bundle-shaped, replay-derived inputs — declarative topology echoes only.
- The illustration stays non-enforcing: no autonomous recovery, no closed-loop execution on external systems.
- LP-004 — Replay portable summary JSON (recon.trust_survival.replay_portable_evidence.v1): bounded replay evidence lineage; exporter sets carriesExecutionAuthority: false.
- LP-005 — One-file portable trust bundle (recon.trust_survival.portable_trust_evidence_bundle.v1): nests LP-004 hashable lineage with governance-augment caps; declarative manifests only.
- LP-006 — Portable verifier exchange envelope (recon.trust_runtime.portable_verifier_exchange.envelope.v0): replay-derived digest commitments and topology echoes from bundle-shaped inputs — paste/parse composition, not authenticated verifier I/O.
Recovery & admissibility posture
- Portable bundle narrative (LP-005) nests replay lineage summaries (LP-004) — digests and labels, carriesExecutionAuthority false.
- Verifier exchange envelopes (LP-006) and local receipts (LP-007) keep paste/parse posture; continuity attestation (LP-008) optional.
- Handshake and interoperability echoes (LP-009/LP-010) appear only as structured continuity storytelling — no wire protocol.
Outcome
- Review-facing JSON stays verifier-ready within guided-demo scope — teams still map artifacts to local policy and contracts.
- The storyline reads cleanly as Before → bounded replay signal → portable envelopes → reviewer dialogue — not a compliance verdict.
Guided runtime scenarios are synthetic and illustrative; design-partner workflows use replay-safe proof environments — no live production execution authority, traction metrics, or customer identities claimed here.
- •Continuous admissibility: bounded replay informs reviewer dialogue — not an automated admissibility verdict from this UX.
- •Portable continuity evidence stays hash-forward (LP-004/LP-005); verifier exchange remains local paste/parse posture.
- •Verifier continuity via LP-006/LP-007 echoes supports reviewer rotation — not authenticated verifier I/O or external mediation.