Runtime admissibility narrative
Regulated runtime intake surface
Read-only intake narrative — no regulator role claimed here, no protected payloads surfaced, no orchestration or execution authority for external systems.
Non-enforcing, replay-safe wording throughout; verifier surfaces derive JSON within guided-demo scope — no wire authority on this route.
Interoperability context: LangChain / LangGraph-oriented flows, OpenAI Agents-style runtimes, multi-agent topology echoes, portable verifier exchange, and regulated-runtime readiness — replay-safe, non-enforcing JSON only.
{ "carriesExecutionAuthority": false }Narrative flow strip — illustrative labels only.
Runtime intake
- LP-004 — Replay portable summary JSON (recon.trust_survival.replay_portable_evidence.v1): bounded replay evidence lineage; exporter sets carriesExecutionAuthority: false.
- LP-005 — One-file portable trust bundle (recon.trust_survival.portable_trust_evidence_bundle.v1): nests LP-004 hashable lineage with governance-augment caps; declarative manifests only.
- LP-008 — Continuity attestation envelope + receipt (recon.trust_runtime.portable_continuity_attestation.envelope.v0; recon.trust_runtime.continuity_attestation.receipt.v0): artifact, internal receipt, deterministic continuity digest; optional LP-006 echo — no signing keys.
- LP-009 — Portable trust handshake (recon.trust_runtime.portable_trust_handshake.envelope.v0; recon.trust_runtime.cross_org_trust_handshake.receipt.v0): digest commitments and declared tenant placeholders over LP-006/LP-008 — JSON export only.
- Topology echoes in verifier envelopes summarize replay-declared coordination handles — fetch stays bounded to bundle-shaped inputs and guided-demo posture (no ontology mutation from this UX).
- LP-006 — Portable verifier exchange envelope (recon.trust_runtime.portable_verifier_exchange.envelope.v0): replay-derived digest commitments and topology echoes from bundle-shaped inputs — paste/parse composition, not authenticated verifier I/O.
- LP-007 — Bundle verification receipt (recon.trust_runtime.trust_bundle_verification_receipt.v0): read-only verifier-safe receipt beside LP-006; JSON stays local to the verifier surface.
Runtime admissibility
For dynamic AI runtimes, admissibility is best understood as ongoing runtime evidence posture and continuity — not reliance on a one-time stamp or certificate alone.
Model behavior, toolchain updates, and policy overlays shift over time — admissibility is expressed as repeatable runtime evidence lineage and verifier-safe continuity summaries, not a single static endorsement.
Regulated runtime environments
- Healthcare workflows where decision support changes over time — evidence trails stay portable.
- Financial services contexts that pair model updates with reviewer-facing continuity summaries.
- Public-sector systems that need repeatable verifier exchange without asserting enforcement here.
- Defense-adjacent programs evaluating multi-tenant attestations alongside existing review gates.
- Legal workspaces comparing portable continuity receipts across matter boundaries.
- Multi-agent ops where topology continuity overlays describe coordination handles from replay-derived inputs — not autonomous control.
Replay-safe evidence
Portable evidence excludes protected payload reconstruction — tenant-safe digests and declared labels only.
LP-010 — Runtime interoperability envelope + cross-system receipt (recon.trust_runtime.runtime_trust_interoperability.envelope.v0; recon.trust_runtime.cross_system_trust_interoperability.receipt.v0): composition of LP-005/006/008/009 echoes with declarative topology/interop fragments — no wire protocol.
Inspect seeded replay timelines, continuity overlays, and interoperability receipts locally — hashing and labels only; exports stay verifier-shaped.
Governance alignment
Portable trust bundles and verifier-safe receipts aim for alignment with familiar governance patterns and verifier expectations; this describes interoperability posture — not a government compliance platform.
Teams still map artifacts to local policy, supervisory review paths, and contract terms — this page describes continuity packaging and verifier posture, aligned to common governance and verifier frameworks without substituting legal advice.