BYO runtime · Workspace Trust Agent · Trust layer

Bring your own models. Activate your Trust Agent.

Replay-safe continuity (guided)Verifier-safe exchangePortable evidence path

Inspect, replay, and explain AI runtime behavior. Recon stays above your stack with replay-safe evidence and operator-guided posture—not autonomous governance or generic chat.

Supported runtimes
OpenAIAnthropicOllamaLangChainMCPCustom

One trust layer across all of them. BYO Runtime overview →

Seeded links use guided workspace org_demo_legal · sign in for your tenant data

TrustGraph · Replay · Continuity
Living runtime trust mesh

Continuity overlays on a runtime topology—not a conversion funnel. Replay highlights the edges where trust moves.

Live topology · 14 recent trust-state edges · fleet sample (same pattern as TrustGraph runtime)

Replay edge trace
Verifier posture ribbon

Trust topology from database sample: agents on the left connect through runtime to tools on the right, showing up to 10 recent edges.

Replay studio sequence
Continuity story at a glance
  1. Continuity shiftReplay-derived

    Topology detects posture drift across runtime edges

  2. Verifier posture changeReplay-derived

    Receipt scope tightens against policy-bound evidence

  3. Recovery pivotReplay-derived

    Replay selects a bounded continuation path

  4. Portable continuity attestationReplay-derived

    Cross-runtime bundle anchors verifier exchange

Topology continuity reads as interoperability posture across surfaces—synthetic replay-derived echoes for illustration, not wire authority or live enforcement.

Workspace Trust Agent

An inspection companion—not a chatbot shell

Every workspace gets a scoped Trust Agent for replay guidance, GhostLog interpretation, trust timelines, and mission lineage—Starter stays inspect-only (no autonomous actions). Aliethia stays on first contact and mission framing; the Trust Agent stays tied to runtime evidence and replay posture.

  • Inspect-only Starter posture

    Guides install, first replay, and receipt vocabulary without taking action on your behalf.

  • Replay narration

    Points to where execution diverged and what evidence exists—forensic language, not assistant banter.

  • GhostLog & timeline

    Surfaces lineage you can defend; summaries stay tethered to traces, not detached prose.

  • Trust scores in context

    Interprets Reflex and RTS as operational signals inside your workspace—not generic model judging.

  • Mission continuity

    Flags incomplete or broken lineage so operators fix posture before failures compound.

  • Tier-scoped agency

    Higher tiers add drift watch and guided repairs; moves stay policy-bound and receipt-backed.

Visible receipts

Activation is only useful when the proof is replay-safe.

These visible receipts turn runtime behavior into inspectable evidence: GhostLog artifacts, drift posture, replay availability, and Trust Agent summaries that read like operations records instead of chat transcripts.

Replay flow

Replay sequence visual

Replay-safe path
  1. 1
    T+00:00
    Runtime action

    Agent selected refund.lookup and prepared tool payload for mission RCN-042.

    Captured
  2. 2
    T+00:04
    GhostLog capture

    Input, tool intent, output hash, and operator scope sealed into GhostLog.

    Stable
  3. 3
    T+00:09
    Drift detection

    Trust delta crossed review threshold after endpoint mismatch surfaced.

    Drift detected
  4. 4
    T+00:12
    Replay available

    Bounded replay package ready with trace context and evidence pointers.

    Replay ready
  5. 5
    T+00:15
    Trust Agent summary

    Runtime posture summarized for operator review without autonomous action.

    Review queued
Runtime evidence

Trust Agent · Runtime Posture

Ops evidence panel
Current posture
Runtime State
Instrumented / trace accepted
Drift Status
Endpoint mismatch under review
Replay Availability
Bounded replay packet ready
Trust Score
82 / stable with review flag
Mission Continuity
Lineage intact across handoff
Recent evidence
  • GhostLog18:22:09

    Entry GL-1182 sealed tool intent, payload hash, and response envelope.

  • Lineage18:22:13

    Mission RCN-042 maintained parent trace through refund.lookup call.

  • Drift event18:22:17

    Endpoint selection diverged from operator-approved path by one hop.

  • Replay18:22:24

    Packet RPL-7A9 generated with redacted inputs and verifier notes.

Signature artifact

GhostLog snapshot

Compact signature artifact for replay review.

Signature artifact
StableDrift DetectedReplay ReadyLineage Sealed
Timestamp
2026-05-14 18:22:09 UTC
Runtime
LangChain / OpenAI tools
Mission
RCN-042 customer refund lookup
Tool
refund.lookup -> customer.record
Trust delta
-18 pts after endpoint mismatch
Replay available
Yes / bounded packet RPL-7A9
Trust timeline

Runtime trust timeline

Timestamped event lines for forensic replay posture.

  1. Mission RCN-042 entered runtime with operator-approved refund lookup scope.

  2. Runtime action captured: refund.lookup selected with customer.record target.

  3. GhostLog sealed input envelope, tool intent, response hash, and lineage pointer.

  4. Drift detected: selected endpoint deviated from approved mission path.

  5. Replay package generated and marked available for operator review.

  6. Trust Agent posted runtime posture summary with no autonomous remediation.

Replay everywhere

AI systems should be replay-native by default.

Replay-native systems keep runtime behavior inspectable over time: lineage, checkpoints, drift posture, and recovery context. Recon frames that continuity as static public posture here, not live telemetry.

PR workflowsAgent pipelinesMCP toolsRuntime chainsApproval gatesOrchestration graphs
Without Recon

What happens without replay?

  • Broken lineage hides where behavior changed.
  • Invisible drift compounds across retries and tool calls.
  • Recovery depends on screenshots, logs, and memory.
With Recon

Replay keeps the record coherent.

  • Replay reconstructs the runtime chain from receipts.
  • GhostLog keeps continuity, posture, and checkpoints visible.
  • Recovery traces show what changed and why operators reviewed it.
Runtime governance narrative

Governance is continuity first: replay integrity, lineage preservation, and trust checkpoints that keep operators oriented when agent workflows cross tools, approvals, and recovery paths.

  • Lineage preservation across handoffs and retries.
  • Trust checkpoints before authority-sensitive moves.
  • Replay integrity so reviews start from the same evidence chain.
Operational Trust Index
Continuity82
Replay integrity76
Posture clarity88

Illustrative index - not a live product metric.

TrustGraph public preview

Topology you can replay

Static pseudo-graph
Auto-step highlights are illustrative only.
Drift: policy edge
Posture: guided demo
PR workflow: PR workflow: the initiating workflow that anchors replay lineage.

Illustrative topology only: guided-demo posture, static nodes, and no live graph layout engine or customer telemetry.

Illustrative replay-safe example - not live telemetry.

Runtime trust matrix

Recon does not replace your runtime. It governs trust across it.

Coverage is model- and framework-neutral: connect your stack, keep receipts in GhostLog, and replay the same trust surfaces. Actual depth follows your ingestion wiring and plan limits—this table is the product contract shape, not a vendor-specific integration roster.

Runtime families and trust surfaces supported by the Recon trust layer
RuntimeReplayGhostLogTrust scoreDrift watchTimeline
OpenAI
Anthropic
Ollama
LangChain
MCP
Custom runtimes

Runtime trust protocol layer

Public pathways through the same verifier-shaped protocol surfaces the product ships: portable bundles, survivability replay, and continuity-over-time narrative. Surfaces stay illustrative and replay-safe; verifier JSON keeps carriesExecutionAuthority false.

Seeded query string (read-only demo scope): orgId=org_demo_legal&missionId=org_demo_legal:trust_graph_runtime. Public routes still respect tenant data—sign in and select a workspace to attach your own mission scope.

AI-native retrieval + human-ready conversion

Clear definitions for agents; proof and drilldowns for operators

  • LangChain & agent frameworks
  • Multi-step production workflows
  • API & tool-heavy systems

When to use ReconAI

  • When your AI agent produces inconsistent or unreliable outputs
  • When multi-step workflows break without clear errors
  • When you need to validate, retry, and track agent decisions
  • When deploying agent workloads in production environments

What ReconAI does

  • Detects breakdowns in agent workflows
  • Scores outputs using a trust-based system (Reflex Score)
  • Triggers recovery actions such as retry or reprompt
  • Logs all actions for replay, validation, and auditing

How ReconAI fits in your stack

Agent stacks flow from models through frameworks into tools and APIs. ReconAI is the runtime trust operating system layer—a continuity control plane between agent execution and downstream surfaces—so evidence exports and verifier posture stay coherent without implying an autonomous operating system.

When you are mapping to common federal intake patterns or audit-grade evidence expectations, the same layer stays runtime-first: replay-evidenced traces, portable bundles, and continuity attestation—not a compliance dashboard bolt-on.

Typical stack

LLMAgent frameworkReconAITools / APIs

Runtime trust · regulated posture

Built for regulated runtime environments

For teams that need AI systems to stay intake-ready, replay-evidenced, verifier-safe, and continuously admissible—without shrinking Recon into “compliance software.”

  • Intake-ready: bounded replay and GhostLog lineage operators can walk through under scrutiny
  • Replay-safe evidence and portable bundles for verifier exchange across teams or runtimes
  • Portable attestations and continuity overlays so trust stays coherent across handoffs
  • Light alignment with common federal intake shapes—honest about what the product proves at runtime
  • Continuous admissibility as ongoing runtime evidence posture — not a one-time seal or certificate substitute.
  • Portable continuity evidence plus verifier continuity across handoffs — structured echoes, carriesExecutionAuthority false.
  • Runtime intake readiness alongside trust-runtime interoperability fragments (LP-010 posture) — declarative continuity only, no wire authority.
Runtime interoperability context

Named ecosystems appear as interoperability context only — not sponsorship, endorsement, certification, or trademark claims; surfaces stay replay-safe and non-enforcing.

  • Designed to interoperate with LangChain- and LangGraph-style agent graphs — verifier-shaped exports remain JSON-only with carriesExecutionAuthority false.
  • Built to interoperate with OpenAI Agents-style runtime flows where continuity evidence stays replay-derived and reviewer-local.
  • Multi-agent coordination is framed through topology echoes from bundle-shaped inputs — not autonomous execution authority on external systems.
  • Portable verifier exchange posture aligns with LP-006/LP-007 storytelling — paste/parse composition beside local verifier workflows.
  • Regulated-runtime readiness uses intake-aligned vocabulary — no supervisory endorsement, government approval, or enforcement claim.

Example use case

API misfire in a multi-step agent

An agent retrieves customer data, selects an API, and executes a transaction—but picks the wrong endpoint.

The same replay-evidence path matters when autonomy must stay verifier-safe: portable bundles, continuity attestation, and bounded replay—runtime trust continuity for regulated admissibility, not checkbox tooling.

Without ReconAI
  • The error goes unnoticed
  • The workflow continues with incorrect data
With ReconAI
  • Detects mismatch between intent and action
  • Stops or retries the step
  • Logs the failure in GhostLog
  • Assigns a Reflex Score to evaluate trust

Who should use ReconAI

  • Developers building AI agents with frameworks like LangChain
  • Teams deploying agent workflows in production
  • Companies needing auditability and trust in AI decisions
  • Platforms integrating multiple tools, APIs, and agents
Before
  • Blind retries
  • Guessing if outputs are correct
  • No visibility into failures
After
  • Measurable Recon Trust Score (RTS)
  • Visible recovery loops
  • Operator-level control
Core capabilities

Trust continuity at runtime—not another agent builder

ReconAI does not assemble prompts. It sustains runtime trust with drift signals, scoring, recovery where policy allows, and replayable lineage—portable runtime evidence operators can govern.

01

Drift detection

Identify when an agent deviates from expected behavior across multiple steps—before the workflow compounds the wrong state.

02

Reflex scoring

Score outputs on consistency, correctness, and alignment with task intent using a trust-based Reflex Score.

03

Policy-governed recovery

Trigger retry, reprompt, or correction loops when policy allows—after a step fails validation—without implying unattended autonomous control.

04

GhostLog replay

Log every action for replay, validation, and auditing—so operators can see what happened and why.

What makes ReconAI different

ReconAI does not build agents. ReconAI ensures agents behave correctly.

It is not
  • A prompt optimizer
  • A chatbot builder
  • A workflow generator
It is
  • A trust and control layer for AI systems
  • Portable runtime evidence and trust continuity for agent actions
  • Reliability infrastructure for autonomous workflows

Most AI systems fail quietly. Recon.AI makes every failure visible—and fixable.

Product proof

Multiple entry paths, one operator surface

Start from Replay Studio with the seeded guided scope, open TrustGraph runtime and continuity with the same query params, then use the quickstart hub or narrative demo when you want the install arc. Aliethia, Trust Split, missions, and batches stay available as you go deeper.

Same mission scope · three surfaces
Developer Quickstart hub

Install @reconai/sdk, run the CLI vignette, open seeded replay, then timeline / GhostLog—labeled honestly for starter vs production wiring.

Interactive onboarding

Aliethia · First contact

Capture intent, establish a trust baseline (T₀), and align execution before blind automation takes over.

Recon.AI Aliethia first contact: intent capture and trust baseline
Open first contact →
System health view

Mission Detail

See how entire workflows perform. Identify weak paths, low acceptance rates, and where trust breaks across a mission.

Recon.AI Mission Detail: KPIs and task table for a mission
Open Mission Detail →
Long-horizon belief

Silent policy drift · Trust Split

Long-horizon benchmark trace: watch alignment diverge—drift bands, detection windows, and how Recon intervenes before failures compound (paired runs, not a single bad output).

Recon.AI Trust Split: long-horizon policy drift with and without instrumentation
Open Trust Split demo →
Intervention results

Batch Run Detail

Evaluate intervention impact across multiple targets. See which tasks recovered, failed, or still need attention.

Recon.AI Batch Run Detail: summary metrics and per-target outcomes with honest null deltas
Open Batch Run →

Aliethia shows up inside onboarding when alignment matters—without leading cold technical users through a named character first. Quickstart (/start), first replay, then Recon vs Chaos when you want the narrative arc.

Trust Split · Operational drift

See autonomous policy drift over time — and how Recon detects, explains, and recovers before it compounds.

Long-running workloads quietly bend away from intent. Trust Split proves the behavior on benchmark-grade paired traces so operators get narrative clarity and technical receipts.

Without Recon
  • Silent drift
  • No validation
  • Failures discovered late
With Recon
  • Step-level detection
  • Reflex scoring
  • Governed recovery loops
  • Full system visibility
Trust Split: long-horizon policy drift preview

Interactive paired run across the benchmark horizon—compare unchecked drift versus instrumented recovery.

Operator console

Your TrustOps command center

Operate trust like a system. See where behavior breaks, what got repaired, and whether the intervention actually worked.

Conversion Dashboard

See trust movement across the system, spot drop-off points, and measure recovery performance.

Mission Detail

Drill into weak workflows, compare outcomes, and identify where trust leaks inside a mission.

Trust Split · policy drift

Silent operational misalignment over calendar time — benchmark-paired runs, interventions, and receipts (Vending-Bench harness underneath).

Batch Run Detail

Measure intervention impact, compare before-and-after signals, and inspect which targets recovered or failed.

Recovery loop

Don't just detect failures. Fix them.

Recon.AI does not stop at observation. It retries intelligently, reprompts strategically, validates outcomes, and measures improvement over time.

Retry intelligently
Recover weak tasks without blindly re-running the entire system.
Reprompt strategically
Change the intervention path when the original prompt or behavior is the issue.
Measure improvement
Track acceptance, recovery, and reflex deltas after every intervention.
Learn over time
Build pattern memory across missions, tasks, and batch runs.
Trust, quantified

Turn AI behavior into measurable signals

If you cannot measure trust, you cannot improve it. Recon.AI turns silent behavior into visible operational signals.

Reflex Score (0–100)
Recovery Rate
Acceptance Rate
Stage Loss Breakdown
Time to Outcome
Batch Impact
Introducing TrustOps

A new layer for AI systems

DevOps manages infrastructure.

MLOps manages models.

TrustOps manages behavior.

Recon.AI is built to detect breakdowns, trigger recovery, validate outcomes, and prove whether AI behavior is becoming more trustworthy.
Integration overview

Works across your AI stack

ReconAI integrates with agent frameworks, API-based systems, and custom AI pipelines. Typical integration: wrap agent execution with the ReconAI SDK, track each step, and apply scoring and recovery automatically.

LangChain
Custom agents
API-based workflows
Multi-step pipelines
Agent-heavy production workloads
Internal trust operations

Simple explanation

ReconAI keeps runtime trust continuous in multi-step agent workflows: portable runtime evidence, Reflex-style scoring where enabled, and recovery paths that stay governable—bounded replay included.

Frequently asked questions

What is ReconAI?

ReconAI is a runtime trust continuity layer for agent systems. It preserves portable runtime evidence, supports bounded replay, and keeps multi-step behavior governable.

When should I use ReconAI?

Use ReconAI when AI agents produce inconsistent outputs, when multi-step agent workflows break silently, or when you need retry, validation, and trust scoring in production.

Does ReconAI build agents?

No. ReconAI does not build agents. It validates behavior, sustains trust continuity, preserves replayable runtime evidence, and applies recovery where policy allows—without selling “monitoring” as the category.

Call to action

Start building reliable AI systems

View docs, explore use cases, and integrate ReconAI between your agents and execution layer.

No setup required • See real examples in seconds

Runtime state (illustrative)

  • Bounded replay interval pinned for reviewer compare — guided posture only; non-enforcing.
  • Verifier envelope digest echoes topology commitments — paste/parse beside local workflows.
  • Portable bundle manifest references LP-004 lineage hashes — digests and labels; no protected payloads.
{
  "carriesExecutionAuthority": false,
  "posture": "guided-replay-illustrative"
}

Signals above are synthetic guided-demo posture — not live authority, production enforcement, or autonomous control of external systems.