Recovery sequencing
Orderly pivots without claiming closed-loop execution
Storyboard for how teams narrate interruption, recovery pivots, verifier reassessment, restoration, and admissibility preservation — always non-enforcing, replay-safe cadence.
This is not an incident commander or SOAR flow — links point to the runtime recovery case study and seeded Replay/TrustGraph illustrations.
Interoperability context: LangChain / LangGraph-oriented flows, OpenAI Agents-style runtimes, multi-agent topology echoes, portable verifier exchange, and regulated-runtime readiness — replay-safe, non-enforcing JSON only.
{ "carriesExecutionAuthority": false }Storyboard (synthetic sequencing)
- Interruption
Replay timelines diverge qualitatively — illustrative discontinuity language only.
- Recovery pivot
Teams re-anchor on portable bundles and verifier exchange receipts before expanding scope.
- Verifier reassessment
Reviewers re-run local verification against refreshed digests — still carriesExecutionAuthority false.
- Restoration
Survivability overlays describe steady posture without automated remediation verbs.
- Admissibility preservation
Continuity attestations and interoperability envelopes document rhythm, not regulator sign-off here.
Deep narrative (synthetic case study): Runtime recovery →