Persistence as continuity rhythm
Longitudinal continuity — posture that outlasts a single slice
Continuity memory is longitudinal: verifier expectations, attestations, and portable proofs stay interpretable across revisions — distinct from dashboards that only celebrate point-in-time green lights.
Survivability memory, portable proof retention, and verifier persistence describe how envelopes stay hash-linked and reviewer-local across workflow generations — LP-008/LP-010 arcs echo here as structured storytelling, carriesExecutionAuthority false.
Doctrine echoes Ω.7–Ω.10 (copy only): remind readers readiness is coherence-qualified — narration stays non-enforcing.
Interoperability context: LangChain / LangGraph-oriented flows, OpenAI Agents-style runtimes, multi-agent topology echoes, portable verifier exchange, and regulated-runtime readiness — replay-safe, non-enforcing JSON only.
{ "persistedContinuityEcho": true, "carriesExecutionAuthority": false }Longitudinal memory posture
- Continuity attestations summarize deterministic lineage without importing protected payloads — persistence is verifier posture toward JSON, not database row counts.
- Portable proof retention references LP-005/LP-006 packaging so reviewers reopen the same continuity conversation — synthetic demo scope illustrates the shape.
- Verifier persistence means local verification artifacts remain paste/parse beside exchange envelopes — not authenticated verifier network claims.
See the portable proof lifecycle narrative for staged ordering, and the full runtime trust protocol vocabulary for LP-004–LP-010 arcs referenced here as factual product shapes.